[Grem] The Wuhan Virus may have been deliberately engineered ......

[Reinisch Egon]

Kedves Lista !

Mint tudjátok mást sem tettem eddig a listán mint összeesküvés 
elméleteket próbáltam cáfolni .

De ez a kérdés most több mint érdekes. Akit érdekel a téma Írja be a 
keresőbe "Luc Montagnier ,Wuhan " szavakat és előjönnek magyar és angol 
nyelvű cikkek.

Itt az  a rettenetes felelősség merül fel ,hogyha valaki eleve ismerte a 
ennek a dögnek a tulajdonságait és időben szól akkor esetleg egészen 
másként kellett volna ellene hatóanyagot keresni .A fertőzés még is csak 
Wuhanból indult ,azzal együtt hogy nem kínai cégek is benne voltak a 
projektben.


E.

2020.04.26. 21:46 keltezéssel, csakany írta:
> Kedves Mindenki!
> Ha a vírus mesterséges, akkor viszont bárhol készülhetett, nem biztos, 
> hogy Kínában. Ez egy Trump köreiből származó, de azért mégiscsak 
> összeesküvés-elmélet.
> Sziasztok         Rita
>
>
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Reinisch Egon wrote:
>
>>
>> A jó öreg Luc ,már rájött erre .
>>
>> 2020.04.26. 19:47 keltezéssel, Emoke Greschik írta:
>>               How COVID-19 may have been deliberately engineered in a 
>> China biolab
>>
>>       The Wuhan Virus may have been deliberately engineered in the 
>> laboratory by joining
>>       parts of different viruses together using what is called 
>> recombinant technology.
>> Wed Apr 22, 2020 - 4:04 pm EST
>> https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/how-covid-19-may-have-been-deliberately-engineered-in-a-chin 
>>
>> a-biolab
>>
>> PETITION: Thank President Trump for halting U.S. funding to 
>> pro-abortion World Health
>> Organization Sign the petition here.
>>
>> April 22, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Let’s start with the bats, the 
>> species known as
>> Intermediate Horseshoe Bat, to be exact.  The Chinese Communist 
>> authorities claim that the
>> China Virus, called SARS-CoV-2, is a naturally occurring coronavirus 
>> that is carried by
>> the Horseshoe Bat. They also claim that the virus “jumped” from its 
>> normal host to humans
>> at the Wuhan “wet” market.
>>
>> Both of these claims are demonstrably false.
>>
>> Let’s start with the Wuhan “wet” market. As I told Jesse Watters on 
>> his FOX news show,
>> “Watters World,” last week, if the “wet” market was actually “ground 
>> zero” for the
>> outbreak, the authorities would have burned it to the ground. 
>> Instead, they have now
>> reopened it.
>>
>> It is an open secret in Wuhan that, as a team of researchers from 
>> Wuhan noted in late
>> February, that there were no bats in the market and that direct 
>> transmission from bats to
>> humans in the market was “unlikely.”
>>
>> Two other researchers had reported the same thing a week earlier, 
>> namely, “[T]he bat was
>> never a food source in the city and no bat was traded in the 
>> market.”  But these
>> researchers, both surnamed Xiao, went even further.  They pointed out 
>> that there were bats
>> in Wuhan--thousands of them—but they were being kept in two biolabs 
>> not far from the “wet”
>> market where they were used for research purposes.
>>
>> [FORM]
>> SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite's daily headlines
>> [FORM]
>> U.S. Canada World Catholic
>>
>> They identified the two labs as the Wuhan Centers for Disease Control 
>> and Prevention (CDC)
>> and the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).  The Wuhan CDC is the 
>> national center for
>> China’s bat coronavirus research.  Wuhan Institute of Virology uses 
>> recombinant technology
>> to create and study new coronaviruses. The conclusion of the two 
>> Doctors Xiao was that
>> “somebody was entangled with the evolution of [SARS-CoV-2] … the 
>> killer coronavirus
>> probably escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan.”
>>
>> Their word choice is a little awkward because the researchers were 
>> writing in what is for
>> them foreign language. But what they clearly mean is that the China 
>> Coronavirus now
>> plaguing the planet is not the result of a natural recombination of 
>> two different viruses
>> in nature through an intermediate host, as many claim.  Rather it was 
>> deliberately
>> engineered in the laboratory by joining parts of different viruses 
>> together using what is
>> called recombinant technology.
>>
>> More on the science of how this was done later.  Right now all you 
>> need to know is that,
>> within a few hours of its publication, their paper on “The possible 
>> origins of
>> [SARS-CoV-2] coronavirus” was withdrawn.  This same fate has since 
>> befallen several papers
>> by Chinese authors who have attempted, at great risk to themselves, 
>> to reveal the truth
>> about the origin of the outbreak to the world.
>>
>> Now back to the bats.
>>
>> China’s chief bat hunter is an employee of the Wuhan CDC named Tian 
>> Junhua.  Mr. Tian’s
>> full-time job since 2012 has been collecting bat viruses for research 
>> purposes. Over this
>> time he collected thousands of live bats, as well as countless 
>> samples of bat urine and
>> feces, from caves over six hundred miles distant from Wuhan. The tiny 
>> mammals obviously
>> didn’t get to the city under their own power, but were trapped and 
>> transported to the two
>> biolabs by the industrious Mr. Tian.  As the two Drs. Xiao wryly 
>> noted, “The probability
>> was very low for the bats to fly to the market.”
>>
>> As a result of the efforts of Mr. Tian and others, China now boasts 
>> that it has “taken the
>> lead” in global virus research. It claims to have discovered over 
>> 2,000 new viruses since
>> the SARS Coronavirus epidemic of 2003.  To give you a sense of the 
>> scale of China’s
>> effort, the total number of viruses discovered over the last two 
>> hundred years is, at
>> 2,284, only slightly more.  China’s frenzied collection efforts have 
>> nearly doubled the
>> total number of known viruses, and includes hundreds of new and 
>> possibly dangerous
>> coronaviruses.
>>
>> That’s a lot of potentially harmful pathogens to keep track of. But 
>> it is also a huge
>> cache of coronaviruses to harvest parts and pieces from if you are 
>> looking to make an
>> already deadly coronavirus even deadlier.
>>
>> And that seems to be exactly what a group of researchers at the Wuhan 
>> Institute of
>> Virology, led by a woman named Shi Zhengli, may have been intent upon 
>> doing right up until
>> the end of 2019.
>>
>> We all know what happened then.
>>
>>     The Technology
>>
>> Shi Zhengli received her master’s degree from the Wuhan Institute of 
>> Virology in 1990.
>> After earning her Ph.D. in France, she returned to WIV to direct the 
>> Institute’s research
>> project into bat coronaviruses.  If Mr. Tian is China’s batman, Dr. 
>> Shi is China’s
>> batwoman.
>>
>> Some of the articles published by Dr. Shi and her team of virologists 
>> describe naturally
>> occurring SARS-like coronaviruses that,  like the SARS virus itself, 
>> could infect human
>> beings directly.
>>
>> But Dr. Shi’s group was not content to merely study existing 
>> coronaviruses. They were also
>> genetically engineering new ones.  In a 2008 article in the Journal 
>> of Virology, she and
>> her team described how they were genetically engineering SARS-like 
>> viruses from horseshoe
>> bats to enable them to use angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) to 
>> gain entry into human
>> cells.
>>
>> In other words, more than 10 years ago, Shi’s team was already 
>> creating entirely new and
>> deadly coronaviruses.  They did so by inserting that part of the 
>> dangerous SARS virus that
>> allows it to infect people into a second bat coronavirus, which was 
>> then able to attack
>> human cells just like the original SARS virus does.
>>
>> But simply recreating a new SARS virus was only a first step. Shi and 
>> her team wanted to
>> move beyond that to create completely new, and potentially even more 
>> deadly coronaviruses.
>> For that she needed a new and more advanced recombinant technique.  
>> She may have found one
>> in research being done at the University of North Carolina by Prof. 
>> Ralph S. Baric.
>>
>> Prof. Baric had developed a technique for quickly and easily 
>> producing what he called
>> “infectious clones.” This involves taking coronaviruses from 
>> horseshoe bats and
>> genetically engineering them to more easily infect human cells.
>>
>> Why would he--or anyone else for that matter--do such a thing?
>>
>> Baric explains: “In 2013 preemergent SARS-like Coronaviruses were 
>> identified in horseshoe
>> bats and found to be poised for entry into the human population. … 
>> preemergent
>> coronaviruses (CoVs) pose a global threat that requires immediate 
>> intervention. Rapid
>> intervention necessitates the capacity to generate, grow, and 
>> genetically manipulate
>> infectious CoVs in order to rapidly evaluate pathogenic mechanisms, 
>> host and tissue
>> permissibility, and candidate antiviral therapeutic efficacy.” 
>> (italics added)
>>
>> Now all of this—preemergent coronaviruses … poised for entry … global 
>> threat … requires
>> immediate intervention—all sounds very ominous.  But what people need 
>> to understand is
>> that the good professor is talking about coronaviruses that have not 
>> actually infected a
>> single, living, breathing human being.  Rather, he is talking about 
>> coronaviruses that
>> might, possibly, at some point in the future, make the leap from bats 
>> to humans. Or they
>> might not. Ever.
>>
>> This means that the phrase “preemergent coronavirus” is at best 
>> misleading, at worst a
>> fiction.  It is a fiction because neither Prof. Baric, nor Dr. Shi 
>> Zhengli, nor anyone
>> else, can possibly know whether any one of these naturally occurring 
>> viruses will ever
>> infect a single human being.
>>
>> In any event, Prof. Baric is very pleased to inform us, citing his 
>> own research, that
>> “much of the [coronavirus] research over the last 15 years has been 
>> possible because of
>> the capacity to generate infectious clones using highly efficient 
>> reverse genetics
>> platforms, coupled with robust small animal models of human disease.”
>>
>> In other words, he and his team used the technique they created to 
>> easily construct
>> unnatural coronaviruses and see if they will infect and kill mice.  
>> Dr. Shi Zhengli
>> collaborated with Baric in carrying out some of this research, as 
>> highlighted in a 2015
>> article in Nature Medicine in which they discussed bat coronaviruses 
>> that were potentially
>> capable of infecting human beings.
>>
>> Now, a sane person might think that the idea of creating dangerous 
>> new pathogens in the
>> lab for which humanity had no acquired immunity, no vaccines, and no 
>> drug therapies might
>> not be a good idea.  The U.S. National Institutes of Health, under 
>> the direction of Dr.
>> Anthony Fauci, however, initially funded Prof. Baric’s research.
>>
>> But then Dr. Fauci had second thoughts.  In late 2014 he sent a 
>> letter to the University
>> of North Carolina, notifying the university that Prof. Baric’s 
>> research project may
>> violate a new moratorium on risky virology studies involving 
>> influenza, MERS and SARS
>> viruses.
>>
>> The letter and the document from the “Public Health Emergency” office 
>> of HHS that it
>> references, orders a pause on “Gain of Function” research into 
>> SARS-like coronaviruses.
>> What is “Gain of Function” research, precisely?  The document defines 
>> it as “research that
>> improves the ability of a pathogen to cause disease … [by] 
>> “confer[ing] attributes to …
>> SARS [coronaviruses] such that the resulting virus has enhanced 
>> pathogenicity and/or
>> transmissibility (via the respiratory route) in mammals. … [that] may 
>> entail biosafety and
>> biosecurity risks.”
>>
>> The original scientific rationale for “enhancing” the ability of 
>> certain coronaviruses to
>> infect and kill human beings was to get one step ahead of the net 
>> pandemic.  “We will
>> create superbugs in the lab,” the scientists said to themselves, “and 
>> we will learn how to
>> defeat them by developing drug therapies and vaccines.  Then when the 
>> next superbug
>> emerges from nature, we will be ready.”
>>
>> But what happens if you create a new superbug in the lab and, before 
>> you have devised a
>> defense against it, it escapes from the lab.  What then?
>>
>> The consequences of unleashing such an “enhanced” coronavirus on the 
>> world—a pathogen for
>> which human beings had no natural defenses, and for which human 
>> science had no treatments
>> or vaccines—would be incalculable.
>>
>> The U.S. pause on such research was not lifted until December 29, 
>> 2017, over three years
>> later, when NIH put in place what it called “robust oversight” that 
>> considers the
>> “scientific merits and potential benefits,” as well as the “potential 
>> to create ... or use
>> an enhanced potential pandemic pathogen.”
>>
>> In other words, the brakes were put on the dangerous 
>> “gain-of-function” research being
>> done in the U.S. for fear that it would “create” a pathogen that 
>> could, if it leaked from
>> the lab, cause a pandemic.  We decided that the risks associated with 
>> such research were
>> generally not worth the benefits.
>>
>> Not so in China, however.  There, in Dr. Shi’s laboratory, the 
>> creation of dangerous
>> “pathogens of pandemic potential” apparently went forward without 
>> pause or effective
>> oversight.  Communist China is not known for its concern for human life.
>>
>> Since we are now dealing with exactly the kind of deadly and 
>> infectious SARS-like
>> coronaviruses that scientists have been creating in the lab for at 
>> least the past ten
>> years, it is reasonable to ask if the China Coronavirus is a 
>> naturally occurring virus.
>> Or is it one of batwoman’s concoctions?
>>
>> Virtually everyone now agrees that the China Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, 
>> leaked from Dr.
>> Shi’s lab.  But I would suggest that the virus itself is the product 
>> of Gain of Function
>> research in which its potency was artificially “enhanced” to make it 
>> more infectious and
>> more lethal using recombinant techniques first developed in the U.S., 
>> perhaps at Prof.
>> Baric’s lab.  The leak was an accident.  The “enhancement” was 
>> deliberate.
>>
>> On March 30th of this year, an unusual, unsigned “Editor’s Note” was 
>> added to Shi and
>> Baric’s original article in Nature Medicine.  The oddly worded note 
>> read: “We are aware
>> that this article is being used as the basis for unverified theories 
>> that the novel
>> coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence 
>> that this is true;
>> scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the 
>> coronavirus.”
>>
>> Actually, the “most likely source” of the coronavirus is not just one 
>> animal but two,
>> whose distinct but related species of coronaviruses were isolated 
>> from their hosts and
>> then pieced together in the lab using recombinant technology to 
>> create a new and much more
>> infectious variety.
>>
>> * * *
>>
>> In Part II I will review the evidence that the novel coronavirus is 
>> the result of what
>> Chinese researchers themselves have called an “unusual insertion” in 
>> a Horseshoe Bat
>> coronavirus that may have come from a Pangolin coronavirus.
>>
>> Steven W. Mosher @StevenWMosher is the President of the Population 
>> Research Institute and
>> the author of Bully of Asia: Why China’s “Dream” is the New Threat to 
>> World Order.
>>
>> RELATED: Listen to minutes 10-15 of interview with Senator Ted Cruz
>>
>>
>> [icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png]
>> Mentes a vírusoktól. www.avg.com
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Grem mailing list
>> Grem at turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu
>> http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/mailman/listinfo/grem
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grem mailing list
> Grem at turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu
> http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/mailman/listinfo/grem


-- 
Ezt az e-mailt az Avast víruskereső szoftver átvizsgálta.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--------- következő rész ---------
Egy csatolt HTML állomány át lett konvertálva...
URL: <http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/pipermail/grem/attachments/20200427/f55f9f11/attachment.html>