[Grem] The Wuhan Virus may have been deliberately engineered ......

[László Baják]

Mások határozottan cáfolták, hogy a vírus mesterséges lenne. Nem hinném,
hogy túlságosan komolyan kellene venni egyik vagy másik állítást.
Információs háború zajlik a világban.

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Mentes
a vírusoktól. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

csakany <csakany at cs.bme.hu> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. ápr. 26., V, 21:46):

> Kedves Mindenki!
> Ha a vírus mesterséges, akkor viszont bárhol készülhetett, nem biztos,
> hogy Kínában. Ez egy Trump köreiből származó, de azért mégiscsak
> összeesküvés-elmélet.
> Sziasztok         Rita
>
>
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Reinisch Egon wrote:
>
> >
> > A jó öreg Luc ,már rájött erre .
> >
> > 2020.04.26. 19:47 keltezéssel, Emoke Greschik írta:
> >               How COVID-19 may have been deliberately engineered in a
> China biolab
> >
> >       The Wuhan Virus may have been deliberately engineered in the
> laboratory by joining
> >       parts of different viruses together using what is called
> recombinant technology.
> > Wed Apr 22, 2020 - 4:04 pm EST
> >
> https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/how-covid-19-may-have-been-deliberately-engineered-in-a-chin
> > a-biolab
> >
> > PETITION: Thank President Trump for halting U.S. funding to pro-abortion
> World Health
> > Organization Sign the petition here.
> >
> > April 22, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Let’s start with the bats, the species
> known as
> > Intermediate Horseshoe Bat, to be exact.  The Chinese Communist
> authorities claim that the
> > China Virus, called SARS-CoV-2, is a naturally occurring coronavirus
> that is carried by
> > the Horseshoe Bat. They also claim that the virus “jumped” from its
> normal host to humans
> > at the Wuhan “wet” market.
> >
> > Both of these claims are demonstrably false.
> >
> > Let’s start with the Wuhan “wet” market. As I told Jesse Watters on his
> FOX news show,
> > “Watters World,” last week, if the “wet” market was actually “ground
> zero” for the
> > outbreak, the authorities would have burned it to the ground. Instead,
> they have now
> > reopened it.
> >
> > It is an open secret in Wuhan that, as a team of researchers from Wuhan
> noted in late
> > February, that there were no bats in the market and that direct
> transmission from bats to
> > humans in the market was “unlikely.”
> >
> > Two other researchers had reported the same thing a week earlier,
> namely, “[T]he bat was
> > never a food source in the city and no bat was traded in the market.”
> But these
> > researchers, both surnamed Xiao, went even further.  They pointed out
> that there were bats
> > in Wuhan--thousands of them—but they were being kept in two biolabs not
> far from the “wet”
> > market where they were used for research purposes.
> >
> > [FORM]
> > SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite's daily headlines
> > [FORM]
> > U.S. Canada World Catholic
> >
> > They identified the two labs as the Wuhan Centers for Disease Control
> and Prevention (CDC)
> > and the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).  The Wuhan CDC is the
> national center for
> > China’s bat coronavirus research.  Wuhan Institute of Virology uses
> recombinant technology
> > to create and study new coronaviruses. The conclusion of the two Doctors
> Xiao was that
> > “somebody was entangled with the evolution of [SARS-CoV-2] … the killer
> coronavirus
> > probably escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan.”
> >
> > Their word choice is a little awkward because the researchers were
> writing in what is for
> > them foreign language. But what they clearly mean is that the China
> Coronavirus now
> > plaguing the planet is not the result of a natural recombination of two
> different viruses
> > in nature through an intermediate host, as many claim.  Rather it was
> deliberately
> > engineered in the laboratory by joining parts of different viruses
> together using what is
> > called recombinant technology.
> >
> > More on the science of how this was done later.  Right now all you need
> to know is that,
> > within a few hours of its publication, their paper on “The possible
> origins of
> > [SARS-CoV-2] coronavirus” was withdrawn.  This same fate has since
> befallen several papers
> > by Chinese authors who have attempted, at great risk to themselves, to
> reveal the truth
> > about the origin of the outbreak to the world.
> >
> > Now back to the bats.
> >
> > China’s chief bat hunter is an employee of the Wuhan CDC named Tian
> Junhua.  Mr. Tian’s
> > full-time job since 2012 has been collecting bat viruses for research
> purposes. Over this
> > time he collected thousands of live bats, as well as countless samples
> of bat urine and
> > feces, from caves over six hundred miles distant from Wuhan. The tiny
> mammals obviously
> > didn’t get to the city under their own power, but were trapped and
> transported to the two
> > biolabs by the industrious Mr. Tian.  As the two Drs. Xiao wryly noted,
> “The probability
> > was very low for the bats to fly to the market.”
> >
> > As a result of the efforts of Mr. Tian and others, China now boasts that
> it has “taken the
> > lead” in global virus research. It claims to have discovered over 2,000
> new viruses since
> > the SARS Coronavirus epidemic of 2003.  To give you a sense of the scale
> of China’s
> > effort, the total number of viruses discovered over the last two hundred
> years is, at
> > 2,284, only slightly more.  China’s frenzied collection efforts have
> nearly doubled the
> > total number of known viruses, and includes hundreds of new and possibly
> dangerous
> > coronaviruses.
> >
> > That’s a lot of potentially harmful pathogens to keep track of.  But it
> is also a huge
> > cache of coronaviruses to harvest parts and pieces from if you are
> looking to make an
> > already deadly coronavirus even deadlier.
> >
> > And that seems to be exactly what a group of researchers at the Wuhan
> Institute of
> > Virology, led by a woman named Shi Zhengli, may have been intent upon
> doing right up until
> > the end of 2019.
> >
> > We all know what happened then.
> >
> >     The Technology
> >
> > Shi Zhengli received her master’s degree from the Wuhan Institute of
> Virology in 1990.
> > After earning her Ph.D. in France, she returned to WIV to direct the
> Institute’s research
> > project into bat coronaviruses.  If Mr. Tian is China’s batman, Dr. Shi
> is China’s
> > batwoman.
> >
> > Some of the articles published by Dr. Shi and her team of virologists
> describe naturally
> > occurring SARS-like coronaviruses that,  like the SARS virus itself,
> could infect human
> > beings directly.
> >
> > But Dr. Shi’s group was not content to merely study existing
> coronaviruses. They were also
> > genetically engineering new ones.  In a 2008 article in the Journal of
> Virology, she and
> > her team described how they were genetically engineering SARS-like
> viruses from horseshoe
> > bats to enable them to use angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) to
> gain entry into human
> > cells.
> >
> > In other words, more than 10 years ago, Shi’s team was already creating
> entirely new and
> > deadly coronaviruses.  They did so by inserting that part of the
> dangerous SARS virus that
> > allows it to infect people into a second bat coronavirus, which was then
> able to attack
> > human cells just like the original SARS virus does.
> >
> > But simply recreating a new SARS virus was only a first step.  Shi and
> her team wanted to
> > move beyond that to create completely new, and potentially even more
> deadly coronaviruses.
> > For that she needed a new and more advanced recombinant technique.  She
> may have found one
> > in research being done at the University of North Carolina by Prof.
> Ralph S. Baric.
> >
> > Prof. Baric had developed a technique for quickly and easily producing
> what he called
> > “infectious clones.” This involves taking coronaviruses from horseshoe
> bats and
> > genetically engineering them to more easily infect human cells.
> >
> > Why would he--or anyone else for that matter--do such a thing?
> >
> > Baric explains: “In 2013 preemergent SARS-like Coronaviruses were
> identified in horseshoe
> > bats and found to be poised for entry into the human population. …
> preemergent
> > coronaviruses (CoVs) pose a global threat that requires immediate
> intervention. Rapid
> > intervention necessitates the capacity to generate, grow, and
> genetically manipulate
> > infectious CoVs in order to rapidly evaluate pathogenic mechanisms, host
> and tissue
> > permissibility, and candidate antiviral therapeutic efficacy.” (italics
> added)
> >
> > Now all of this—preemergent coronaviruses … poised for entry … global
> threat … requires
> > immediate intervention—all sounds very ominous.  But what people need to
> understand is
> > that the good professor is talking about coronaviruses that have not
> actually infected a
> > single, living, breathing human being.  Rather, he is talking about
> coronaviruses that
> > might, possibly, at some point in the future, make the leap from bats to
> humans. Or they
> > might not. Ever.
> >
> > This means that the phrase “preemergent coronavirus” is at best
> misleading, at worst a
> > fiction.  It is a fiction because neither Prof. Baric, nor Dr. Shi
> Zhengli, nor anyone
> > else, can possibly know whether any one of these naturally occurring
> viruses will ever
> > infect a single human being.
> >
> > In any event, Prof. Baric is very pleased to inform us, citing his own
> research, that
> > “much of the [coronavirus] research over the last 15 years has been
> possible because of
> > the capacity to generate infectious clones using highly efficient
> reverse genetics
> > platforms, coupled with robust small animal models of human disease.”
> >
> > In other words, he and his team used the technique they created to
> easily construct
> > unnatural coronaviruses and see if they will infect and kill mice.  Dr.
> Shi Zhengli
> > collaborated with Baric in carrying out some of this research, as
> highlighted in a 2015
> > article in Nature Medicine in which they discussed bat coronaviruses
> that were potentially
> > capable of infecting human beings.
> >
> > Now, a sane person might think that the idea of creating dangerous new
> pathogens in the
> > lab for which humanity had no acquired immunity, no vaccines, and no
> drug therapies might
> > not be a good idea.  The U.S. National Institutes of Health, under the
> direction of Dr.
> > Anthony Fauci, however, initially funded Prof. Baric’s research.
> >
> > But then Dr. Fauci had second thoughts.  In late 2014 he sent a letter
> to the University
> > of North Carolina, notifying the university that Prof. Baric’s research
> project may
> > violate a new moratorium on risky virology studies involving influenza,
> MERS and SARS
> > viruses.
> >
> > The letter and the document from the “Public Health Emergency” office of
> HHS that it
> > references, orders a pause on “Gain of Function” research into SARS-like
> coronaviruses.
> > What is “Gain of Function” research, precisely?  The document defines it
> as “research that
> > improves the ability of a pathogen to cause disease … [by] “confer[ing]
> attributes to …
> > SARS [coronaviruses] such that the resulting virus has enhanced
> pathogenicity and/or
> > transmissibility (via the respiratory route) in mammals. … [that] may
> entail biosafety and
> > biosecurity risks.”
> >
> > The original scientific rationale for “enhancing” the ability of certain
> coronaviruses to
> > infect and kill human beings was to get one step ahead of the net
> pandemic.  “We will
> > create superbugs in the lab,” the scientists said to themselves, “and we
> will learn how to
> > defeat them by developing drug therapies and vaccines.  Then when the
> next superbug
> > emerges from nature, we will be ready.”
> >
> > But what happens if you create a new superbug in the lab and, before you
> have devised a
> > defense against it, it escapes from the lab.  What then?
> >
> > The consequences of unleashing such an “enhanced” coronavirus on the
> world—a pathogen for
> > which human beings had no natural defenses, and for which human science
> had no treatments
> > or vaccines—would be incalculable.
> >
> > The U.S. pause on such research was not lifted until December 29, 2017,
> over three years
> > later, when NIH put in place what it called “robust oversight” that
> considers the
> > “scientific merits and potential benefits,” as well as the “potential to
> create ... or use
> > an enhanced potential pandemic pathogen.”
> >
> > In other words, the brakes were put on the dangerous “gain-of-function”
> research being
> > done in the U.S. for fear that it would “create” a pathogen that could,
> if it leaked from
> > the lab, cause a pandemic.  We decided that the risks associated with
> such research were
> > generally not worth the benefits.
> >
> > Not so in China, however.  There, in Dr. Shi’s laboratory, the creation
> of dangerous
> > “pathogens of pandemic potential” apparently went forward without pause
> or effective
> > oversight.  Communist China is not known for its concern for human life.
> >
> > Since we are now dealing with exactly the kind of deadly and infectious
> SARS-like
> > coronaviruses that scientists have been creating in the lab for at least
> the past ten
> > years, it is reasonable to ask if the China Coronavirus is a naturally
> occurring virus.
> > Or is it one of batwoman’s concoctions?
> >
> > Virtually everyone now agrees that the China Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2,
> leaked from Dr.
> > Shi’s lab.  But I would suggest that the virus itself is the product of
> Gain of Function
> > research in which its potency was artificially “enhanced” to make it
> more infectious and
> > more lethal using recombinant techniques first developed in the U.S.,
> perhaps at Prof.
> > Baric’s lab.  The leak was an accident.  The “enhancement” was
> deliberate.
> >
> > On March 30th of this year, an unusual, unsigned “Editor’s Note” was
> added to Shi and
> > Baric’s original article in Nature Medicine.  The oddly worded note
> read: “We are aware
> > that this article is being used as the basis for unverified theories
> that the novel
> > coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that
> this is true;
> > scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the
> coronavirus.”
> >
> > Actually, the “most likely source” of the coronavirus is not just one
> animal but two,
> > whose distinct but related species of coronaviruses were isolated from
> their hosts and
> > then pieced together in the lab using recombinant technology to create a
> new and much more
> > infectious variety.
> >
> > * * *
> >
> > In Part II I will review the evidence that the novel coronavirus is the
> result of what
> > Chinese researchers themselves have called an “unusual insertion” in a
> Horseshoe Bat
> > coronavirus that may have come from a Pangolin coronavirus.
> >
> > Steven W. Mosher @StevenWMosher is the President of the Population
> Research Institute and
> > the author of Bully of Asia: Why China’s “Dream” is the New Threat to
> World Order.
> >
> > RELATED: Listen to minutes 10-15 of interview with Senator Ted Cruz
> >
> >
> > [icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png]
> > Mentes a vírusoktól. www.avg.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Grem mailing list
> > Grem at turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu
> > http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/mailman/listinfo/grem
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> Grem mailing list
> Grem at turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu
> http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/mailman/listinfo/grem
>

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Mentes
a vírusoktól. www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
--------- következő rész ---------
Egy csatolt HTML állomány át lett konvertálva...
URL: <http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/pipermail/grem/attachments/20200426/b5c05825/attachment.html>