<div dir="ltr">Mások határozottan cáfolták, hogy a vírus mesterséges lenne. Nem hinném, hogy túlságosan komolyan kellene venni egyik vagy másik állítást. Információs háború zajlik a világban. </div><div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br> <table style="border-top:1px solid #d3d4de">
<tr>
<td style="width:55px;padding-top:18px"><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" target="_blank"><img src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif" alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;"></a></td>
<td style="width:470px;padding-top:17px;color:#41424e;font-size:13px;font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;line-height:18px">Mentes a vírusoktól. <a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" target="_blank" style="color:#4453ea">www.avast.com</a> </td>
</tr>
</table>
<a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1" height="1"></a></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">csakany <<a href="mailto:csakany@cs.bme.hu">csakany@cs.bme.hu</a>> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. ápr. 26., V, 21:46):<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Kedves Mindenki!<br>
Ha a vírus mesterséges, akkor viszont bárhol készülhetett, nem biztos, <br>
hogy Kínában. Ez egy Trump köreiből származó, de azért mégiscsak összeesküvés-elmélet.<br>
Sziasztok Rita<br>
<br>
<br>
On Sun, 26 Apr 2020, Reinisch Egon wrote:<br>
<br>
> <br>
> A jó öreg Luc ,már rájött erre .<br>
> <br>
> 2020.04.26. 19:47 keltezéssel, Emoke Greschik írta:<br>
> How COVID-19 may have been deliberately engineered in a China biolab<br>
><br>
> The Wuhan Virus may have been deliberately engineered in the laboratory by joining<br>
> parts of different viruses together using what is called recombinant technology. <br>
> Wed Apr 22, 2020 - 4:04 pm EST<br>
> <a href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/how-covid-19-may-have-been-deliberately-engineered-in-a-chin" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/how-covid-19-may-have-been-deliberately-engineered-in-a-chin</a><br>
> a-biolab<br>
> <br>
> PETITION: Thank President Trump for halting U.S. funding to pro-abortion World Health<br>
> Organization Sign the petition here.<br>
> <br>
> April 22, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – Let’s start with the bats, the species known as<br>
> Intermediate Horseshoe Bat, to be exact. The Chinese Communist authorities claim that the<br>
> China Virus, called SARS-CoV-2, is a naturally occurring coronavirus that is carried by<br>
> the Horseshoe Bat. They also claim that the virus “jumped” from its normal host to humans<br>
> at the Wuhan “wet” market.<br>
> <br>
> Both of these claims are demonstrably false.<br>
> <br>
> Let’s start with the Wuhan “wet” market. As I told Jesse Watters on his FOX news show,<br>
> “Watters World,” last week, if the “wet” market was actually “ground zero” for the<br>
> outbreak, the authorities would have burned it to the ground. Instead, they have now<br>
> reopened it.<br>
> <br>
> It is an open secret in Wuhan that, as a team of researchers from Wuhan noted in late<br>
> February, that there were no bats in the market and that direct transmission from bats to<br>
> humans in the market was “unlikely.” <br>
> <br>
> Two other researchers had reported the same thing a week earlier, namely, “[T]he bat was<br>
> never a food source in the city and no bat was traded in the market.” But these<br>
> researchers, both surnamed Xiao, went even further. They pointed out that there were bats<br>
> in Wuhan--thousands of them—but they were being kept in two biolabs not far from the “wet”<br>
> market where they were used for research purposes.<br>
> <br>
> [FORM]<br>
> SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite's daily headlines<br>
> [FORM]<br>
> U.S. Canada World Catholic<br>
> <br>
> They identified the two labs as the Wuhan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)<br>
> and the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV). The Wuhan CDC is the national center for<br>
> China’s bat coronavirus research. Wuhan Institute of Virology uses recombinant technology<br>
> to create and study new coronaviruses. The conclusion of the two Doctors Xiao was that<br>
> “somebody was entangled with the evolution of [SARS-CoV-2] … the killer coronavirus<br>
> probably escaped from a laboratory in Wuhan.” <br>
> <br>
> Their word choice is a little awkward because the researchers were writing in what is for<br>
> them foreign language. But what they clearly mean is that the China Coronavirus now<br>
> plaguing the planet is not the result of a natural recombination of two different viruses<br>
> in nature through an intermediate host, as many claim. Rather it was deliberately<br>
> engineered in the laboratory by joining parts of different viruses together using what is<br>
> called recombinant technology. <br>
> <br>
> More on the science of how this was done later. Right now all you need to know is that,<br>
> within a few hours of its publication, their paper on “The possible origins of<br>
> [SARS-CoV-2] coronavirus” was withdrawn. This same fate has since befallen several papers<br>
> by Chinese authors who have attempted, at great risk to themselves, to reveal the truth<br>
> about the origin of the outbreak to the world. <br>
> <br>
> Now back to the bats.<br>
> <br>
> China’s chief bat hunter is an employee of the Wuhan CDC named Tian Junhua. Mr. Tian’s<br>
> full-time job since 2012 has been collecting bat viruses for research purposes. Over this<br>
> time he collected thousands of live bats, as well as countless samples of bat urine and<br>
> feces, from caves over six hundred miles distant from Wuhan. The tiny mammals obviously<br>
> didn’t get to the city under their own power, but were trapped and transported to the two<br>
> biolabs by the industrious Mr. Tian. As the two Drs. Xiao wryly noted, “The probability<br>
> was very low for the bats to fly to the market.”<br>
> <br>
> As a result of the efforts of Mr. Tian and others, China now boasts that it has “taken the<br>
> lead” in global virus research. It claims to have discovered over 2,000 new viruses since<br>
> the SARS Coronavirus epidemic of 2003. To give you a sense of the scale of China’s<br>
> effort, the total number of viruses discovered over the last two hundred years is, at<br>
> 2,284, only slightly more. China’s frenzied collection efforts have nearly doubled the<br>
> total number of known viruses, and includes hundreds of new and possibly dangerous<br>
> coronaviruses. <br>
> <br>
> That’s a lot of potentially harmful pathogens to keep track of. But it is also a huge<br>
> cache of coronaviruses to harvest parts and pieces from if you are looking to make an<br>
> already deadly coronavirus even deadlier.<br>
> <br>
> And that seems to be exactly what a group of researchers at the Wuhan Institute of<br>
> Virology, led by a woman named Shi Zhengli, may have been intent upon doing right up until<br>
> the end of 2019. <br>
> <br>
> We all know what happened then.<br>
><br>
> The Technology<br>
> <br>
> Shi Zhengli received her master’s degree from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in 1990. <br>
> After earning her Ph.D. in France, she returned to WIV to direct the Institute’s research<br>
> project into bat coronaviruses. If Mr. Tian is China’s batman, Dr. Shi is China’s<br>
> batwoman.<br>
> <br>
> Some of the articles published by Dr. Shi and her team of virologists describe naturally<br>
> occurring SARS-like coronaviruses that, like the SARS virus itself, could infect human<br>
> beings directly. <br>
> <br>
> But Dr. Shi’s group was not content to merely study existing coronaviruses. They were also<br>
> genetically engineering new ones. In a 2008 article in the Journal of Virology, she and<br>
> her team described how they were genetically engineering SARS-like viruses from horseshoe<br>
> bats to enable them to use angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) to gain entry into human<br>
> cells.<br>
> <br>
> In other words, more than 10 years ago, Shi’s team was already creating entirely new and<br>
> deadly coronaviruses. They did so by inserting that part of the dangerous SARS virus that<br>
> allows it to infect people into a second bat coronavirus, which was then able to attack<br>
> human cells just like the original SARS virus does. <br>
> <br>
> But simply recreating a new SARS virus was only a first step. Shi and her team wanted to<br>
> move beyond that to create completely new, and potentially even more deadly coronaviruses.<br>
> For that she needed a new and more advanced recombinant technique. She may have found one<br>
> in research being done at the University of North Carolina by Prof. Ralph S. Baric.<br>
> <br>
> Prof. Baric had developed a technique for quickly and easily producing what he called<br>
> “infectious clones.” This involves taking coronaviruses from horseshoe bats and<br>
> genetically engineering them to more easily infect human cells. <br>
> <br>
> Why would he--or anyone else for that matter--do such a thing?<br>
> <br>
> Baric explains: “In 2013 preemergent SARS-like Coronaviruses were identified in horseshoe<br>
> bats and found to be poised for entry into the human population. … preemergent<br>
> coronaviruses (CoVs) pose a global threat that requires immediate intervention. Rapid<br>
> intervention necessitates the capacity to generate, grow, and genetically manipulate<br>
> infectious CoVs in order to rapidly evaluate pathogenic mechanisms, host and tissue<br>
> permissibility, and candidate antiviral therapeutic efficacy.” (italics added)<br>
> <br>
> Now all of this—preemergent coronaviruses … poised for entry … global threat … requires<br>
> immediate intervention—all sounds very ominous. But what people need to understand is<br>
> that the good professor is talking about coronaviruses that have not actually infected a<br>
> single, living, breathing human being. Rather, he is talking about coronaviruses that<br>
> might, possibly, at some point in the future, make the leap from bats to humans. Or they<br>
> might not. Ever.<br>
> <br>
> This means that the phrase “preemergent coronavirus” is at best misleading, at worst a<br>
> fiction. It is a fiction because neither Prof. Baric, nor Dr. Shi Zhengli, nor anyone<br>
> else, can possibly know whether any one of these naturally occurring viruses will ever<br>
> infect a single human being.<br>
> <br>
> In any event, Prof. Baric is very pleased to inform us, citing his own research, that<br>
> “much of the [coronavirus] research over the last 15 years has been possible because of<br>
> the capacity to generate infectious clones using highly efficient reverse genetics<br>
> platforms, coupled with robust small animal models of human disease.”<br>
> <br>
> In other words, he and his team used the technique they created to easily construct<br>
> unnatural coronaviruses and see if they will infect and kill mice. Dr. Shi Zhengli<br>
> collaborated with Baric in carrying out some of this research, as highlighted in a 2015<br>
> article in Nature Medicine in which they discussed bat coronaviruses that were potentially<br>
> capable of infecting human beings. <br>
> <br>
> Now, a sane person might think that the idea of creating dangerous new pathogens in the<br>
> lab for which humanity had no acquired immunity, no vaccines, and no drug therapies might<br>
> not be a good idea. The U.S. National Institutes of Health, under the direction of Dr.<br>
> Anthony Fauci, however, initially funded Prof. Baric’s research. <br>
> <br>
> But then Dr. Fauci had second thoughts. In late 2014 he sent a letter to the University<br>
> of North Carolina, notifying the university that Prof. Baric’s research project may<br>
> violate a new moratorium on risky virology studies involving influenza, MERS and SARS<br>
> viruses. <br>
> <br>
> The letter and the document from the “Public Health Emergency” office of HHS that it<br>
> references, orders a pause on “Gain of Function” research into SARS-like coronaviruses. <br>
> What is “Gain of Function” research, precisely? The document defines it as “research that<br>
> improves the ability of a pathogen to cause disease … [by] “confer[ing] attributes to …<br>
> SARS [coronaviruses] such that the resulting virus has enhanced pathogenicity and/or<br>
> transmissibility (via the respiratory route) in mammals. … [that] may entail biosafety and<br>
> biosecurity risks.”<br>
> <br>
> The original scientific rationale for “enhancing” the ability of certain coronaviruses to<br>
> infect and kill human beings was to get one step ahead of the net pandemic. “We will<br>
> create superbugs in the lab,” the scientists said to themselves, “and we will learn how to<br>
> defeat them by developing drug therapies and vaccines. Then when the next superbug<br>
> emerges from nature, we will be ready.”<br>
> <br>
> But what happens if you create a new superbug in the lab and, before you have devised a<br>
> defense against it, it escapes from the lab. What then?<br>
> <br>
> The consequences of unleashing such an “enhanced” coronavirus on the world—a pathogen for<br>
> which human beings had no natural defenses, and for which human science had no treatments<br>
> or vaccines—would be incalculable.<br>
> <br>
> The U.S. pause on such research was not lifted until December 29, 2017, over three years<br>
> later, when NIH put in place what it called “robust oversight” that considers the<br>
> “scientific merits and potential benefits,” as well as the “potential to create ... or use<br>
> an enhanced potential pandemic pathogen.”<br>
> <br>
> In other words, the brakes were put on the dangerous “gain-of-function” research being<br>
> done in the U.S. for fear that it would “create” a pathogen that could, if it leaked from<br>
> the lab, cause a pandemic. We decided that the risks associated with such research were<br>
> generally not worth the benefits.<br>
> <br>
> Not so in China, however. There, in Dr. Shi’s laboratory, the creation of dangerous<br>
> “pathogens of pandemic potential” apparently went forward without pause or effective<br>
> oversight. Communist China is not known for its concern for human life. <br>
> <br>
> Since we are now dealing with exactly the kind of deadly and infectious SARS-like<br>
> coronaviruses that scientists have been creating in the lab for at least the past ten<br>
> years, it is reasonable to ask if the China Coronavirus is a naturally occurring virus. <br>
> Or is it one of batwoman’s concoctions? <br>
> <br>
> Virtually everyone now agrees that the China Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, leaked from Dr.<br>
> Shi’s lab. But I would suggest that the virus itself is the product of Gain of Function<br>
> research in which its potency was artificially “enhanced” to make it more infectious and<br>
> more lethal using recombinant techniques first developed in the U.S., perhaps at Prof.<br>
> Baric’s lab. The leak was an accident. The “enhancement” was deliberate.<br>
> <br>
> On March 30th of this year, an unusual, unsigned “Editor’s Note” was added to Shi and<br>
> Baric’s original article in Nature Medicine. The oddly worded note read: “We are aware<br>
> that this article is being used as the basis for unverified theories that the novel<br>
> coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is true;<br>
> scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus.”<br>
> <br>
> Actually, the “most likely source” of the coronavirus is not just one animal but two,<br>
> whose distinct but related species of coronaviruses were isolated from their hosts and<br>
> then pieced together in the lab using recombinant technology to create a new and much more<br>
> infectious variety.<br>
> <br>
> * * *<br>
> <br>
> In Part II I will review the evidence that the novel coronavirus is the result of what<br>
> Chinese researchers themselves have called an “unusual insertion” in a Horseshoe Bat<br>
> coronavirus that may have come from a Pangolin coronavirus.<br>
> <br>
> Steven W. Mosher @StevenWMosher is the President of the Population Research Institute and<br>
> the author of Bully of Asia: Why China’s “Dream” is the New Threat to World Order.<br>
> <br>
> RELATED: Listen to minutes 10-15 of interview with Senator Ted Cruz<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> [icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png]<br>
> Mentes a vírusoktól. <a href="http://www.avg.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">www.avg.com</a><br>
> <br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Grem mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Grem@turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu" target="_blank">Grem@turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu</a><br>
> <a href="http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/mailman/listinfo/grem" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/mailman/listinfo/grem</a><br>
> <br>
> <br>
>_______________________________________________<br>
Grem mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Grem@turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu" target="_blank">Grem@turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu</a><br>
<a href="http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/mailman/listinfo/grem" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/mailman/listinfo/grem</a><br>
</blockquote></div><div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br> <table style="border-top:1px solid #d3d4de">
<tr>
<td style="width:55px;padding-top:18px"><a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" target="_blank"><img src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif" alt="" width="46" height="29" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;"></a></td>
<td style="width:470px;padding-top:17px;color:#41424e;font-size:13px;font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;line-height:18px">Mentes a vírusoktól. <a href="https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail" target="_blank" style="color:#4453ea">www.avast.com</a> </td>
</tr>
</table>
<a href="#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2" width="1" height="1"></a></div>