[Grem] The Wuhan Virus may have been deliberately engineered ......

[Reinisch Egon]

A jó öreg Luc ,már rájött erre .

2020.04.26. 19:47 keltezéssel, Emoke Greschik írta:
>
>
>   How COVID-19 may have been deliberately engineered in a China biolab
>
> *The Wuhan Virus may have been deliberately engineered in the 
> laboratory by joining parts of different viruses together using what 
> is called recombinant technology. *
> Wed Apr 22, 2020 - 4:04 pm EST
> https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/how-covid-19-may-have-been-deliberately-engineered-in-a-china-biolab
>
> /*PETITION: Thank President Trump for halting U.S. funding to 
> pro-abortion World Health Organization Sign the petition here. 
> <https://lifepetitions.com/petition/urge-president-trump-to-defund-the-world-health-organization-over-alleged-coronavirus-cover-up>*/
>
> April 22, 2020 (LifeSiteNews <http://lifesitenews.com/>) – Let’s start 
> with the bats, the species known as Intermediate Horseshoe Bat, to be 
> exact.  The Chinese Communist authorities claim that the China Virus, 
> called SARS-CoV-2, is a naturally occurring coronavirus that is 
> carried by the Horseshoe Bat. They also claim that the virus “jumped” 
> from its normal host to humans at the Wuhan “wet” market.
>
> Both of these claims are demonstrably false.
>
> Let’s start with the Wuhan “wet” market. As I told 
> <https://twitter.com/StevenWMosher/status/1249376965435555843> Jesse 
> Watters on his FOX news show, “Watters World,” last week, if the “wet” 
> market was actually “ground zero” for the outbreak, the authorities 
> would have burned it to the ground. Instead, they have now reopened it.
>
> It is an open secret in Wuhan that, as a team of researchers from 
> Wuhan noted <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079563/> in 
> late February, that there were no bats in the market and that direct 
> transmission from bats to humans in the market was “unlikely.”
>
> Two other researchers had reported 
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20200214144447/https:/www.researchgate.net/publication/339070128_The_possible_origins_of_2019-nCoV_coronavirus> 
> the same thing a week earlier, namely, “[T]he bat was never a food 
> source in the city and no bat was traded in the market.”  But these 
> researchers, both surnamed Xiao, went even further.  They pointed out 
> that there were bats in Wuhan--thousands of them—but they were being 
> kept in two biolabs not far from the “wet” market where they were used 
> for research purposes.
>
> SUBSCRIBE to LifeSite's daily headlines
>
> U.S. Canada World Catholic
>
> They identified the two labs as the Wuhan Centers for Disease Control 
> and Prevention (CDC) and the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).  The 
> Wuhan CDC is the national center for China’s bat coronavirus 
> research.  Wuhan Institute of Virology uses recombinant technology to 
> create and study new coronaviruses. The conclusion of the two Doctors 
> Xiao was that “somebody was entangled with the evolution of 
> [SARS-CoV-2] … the killer coronavirus probably escaped from a 
> laboratory in Wuhan.”
>
> Their word choice is a little awkward because the researchers were 
> writing in what is for them foreign language. But what they clearly 
> mean is that the China Coronavirus now plaguing the planet is not the 
> result of a natural recombination of two different viruses in nature 
> through an intermediate host, as many claim. Rather it was 
> deliberately engineered in the laboratory by joining parts of 
> different viruses together using what is called recombinant technology.
>
> More on the science of how this was done later.  Right now all you 
> need to know is that, within a few hours of its publication, their 
> paper 
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20200214144447/https:/www.researchgate.net/publication/339070128_The_possible_origins_of_2019-nCoV_coronavirus> 
> on “The possible origins of [SARS-CoV-2] coronavirus” was withdrawn.  
> This same fate has since befallen several papers by Chinese authors 
> who have attempted, at great risk to themselves, to reveal the truth 
> about the origin of the outbreak to the world.
>
> Now back to the bats.
>
> China’s chief bat hunter is an employee of the Wuhan CDC named Tian 
> Junhua.  Mr. Tian’s full-time job since 2012 has been collecting bat 
> viruses for research purposes. Over this time he collected thousands 
> of live bats, as well as countless samples of bat urine and feces, 
> from caves over six hundred miles distant from Wuhan. The tiny mammals 
> obviously didn’t get to the city under their own power, but were 
> trapped and transported to the two biolabs by the industrious Mr. 
> Tian.  As the two Drs. Xiao wryly noted, “The probability was very low 
> for the bats to fly to the market.”
>
> As a result of the efforts of Mr. Tian and others, China now boasts 
> <https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/mar/30/china-researchers-isolated-bat-coronaviruses-near-/> 
> that it has “taken the lead” in global virus research. It claims to 
> have discovered over 2,000 new viruses since the SARS Coronavirus 
> epidemic of 2003.  To give you a sense of the scale of China’s effort, 
> the total number of viruses discovered over the last two hundred years 
> is, at 2,284, only slightly more.  China’s frenzied collection efforts 
> have nearly doubled the total number of known viruses, and includes 
> hundreds of new and possibly dangerous coronaviruses.
>
> That’s a lot of potentially harmful pathogens to keep track of.  But 
> it is also a huge cache of coronaviruses to harvest parts and pieces 
> from if you are looking to make an already deadly coronavirus even 
> deadlier.
>
> And that seems to be exactly what a group of researchers at the Wuhan 
> Institute of Virology, led by a woman named Shi Zhengli, may have been 
> intent upon doing right up until the end of 2019.
>
> We all know what happened then.
>
>
>         The Technology
>
> Shi Zhengli received her master’s degree from the Wuhan Institute of 
> Virology in 1990.  After earning her Ph.D. in France, she returned to 
> WIV to direct the Institute’s research project into bat 
> coronaviruses.  If Mr. Tian is China’s batman, Dr. Shi is China’s 
> batwoman.
>
> Some of the articles published by 
> <https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/disappeared-chinese-research-paper-traced-covid-19-to-china-biolab-in-wuhan> 
> Dr. Shi and her team of virologists describe 
> <https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12711> naturally occurring 
> SARS-like coronaviruses that,  like the SARS virus itself, could 
> infect human beings directly.
>
> But Dr. Shi’s group was not content to merely study existing 
> coronaviruses. They were also genetically engineering new ones. In a 
> 2008 article in the Journal of Virology, she and her team described 
> how <https://jvi.asm.org/content/82/4/1899> they were genetically 
> engineering SARS-like viruses from horseshoe bats to enable them to 
> use angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) to gain entry into human cells.
>
> In other words, more than 10 years ago, Shi’s team was already 
> creating entirely new and deadly coronaviruses.  They did so by 
> inserting that part of the dangerous SARS virus that allows it to 
> infect people into a second bat coronavirus, which was then able to 
> attack human cells just like the original SARS virus does.
>
> But simply recreating a new SARS virus was only a first step.  Shi and 
> her team wanted to move beyond that to create completely new, and 
> potentially even more deadly coronaviruses. For that she needed a new 
> and more advanced recombinant technique.  She may have found one in 
> research being done at the University of North Carolina by Prof. Ralph 
> S. Baric.
>
> Prof. Baric had developed a technique for quickly and easily producing 
> what he called 
> <https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-4939-6964-7_5> 
> “infectious clones.” This involves taking coronaviruses from horseshoe 
> bats and genetically engineering them to more easily infect human cells.
>
> Why would he--or anyone else for that matter--do such a thing?
>
> Baric explains 
> <https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-4939-6964-7_5>: “In 
> 2013 preemergent SARS-like Coronaviruses were identified 
> <https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12711> in horseshoe bats and 
> found to be poised for entry into the human population. … preemergent 
> coronaviruses (CoVs) pose a global threat that requires immediate 
> intervention. Rapid intervention necessitates the capacity to 
> generate, grow, and genetically manipulate infectious CoVs in order to 
> rapidly evaluate pathogenic mechanisms, host and tissue 
> permissibility, and candidate antiviral therapeutic efficacy.” 
> (italics added)
>
> Now all of this—preemergent coronaviruses … poised for entry … global 
> threat … requires immediate intervention—all sounds very ominous.  But 
> what people need to understand is that the good professor is talking 
> about coronaviruses that have not actually infected a single, living, 
> breathing human being.  Rather, he is talking about coronaviruses that 
> might, possibly, at some point in the future, make the leap from bats 
> to humans. Or they might not. Ever.
>
> This means that the phrase “preemergent coronavirus” is at best 
> misleading, at worst a fiction.  It is a fiction because neither Prof. 
> Baric, nor Dr. Shi Zhengli, nor anyone else, can possibly know whether 
> any one of these naturally occurring viruses will ever infect a single 
> human being.
>
> In any event, Prof. Baric is very pleased to inform us 
> <https://www.pnas.org/content/100/22/12995>, citing 
> <https://www.pnas.org/content/100/22/12995> his own research, that 
> “much of the [coronavirus] research over the last 15 years has been 
> possible because of the capacity to generate infectious clones using 
> highly efficient reverse genetics platforms, coupled with robust small 
> animal models of human disease.”
>
> In other words, he and his team used the technique they created to 
> easily construct unnatural coronaviruses and see if they will infect 
> and kill mice 
> <https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.0030005>.  
> Dr. Shi Zhengli collaborated with Baric in carrying out some of this 
> research, as highlighted in a 2015 article 
> <https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985> in Nature Medicine in which 
> they discussed bat coronaviruses that were potentially capable of 
> infecting human beings.
>
> Now, a sane person might think that the idea of creating dangerous new 
> pathogens in the lab for which humanity had no acquired immunity, no 
> vaccines, and no drug therapies might not be a good idea.  The U.S. 
> National Institutes of Health, under the direction of Dr. Anthony 
> Fauci, however, initially funded Prof. Baric’s research.
>
> But then Dr. Fauci had second thoughts.  In late 2014 he sent a letter 
> to the University of North Carolina, notifying the university that 
> Prof. Baric’s research project may violate a new moratorium on risky 
> virology studies involving influenza, MERS and SARS viruses.
>
> The letter and the document 
> <https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/gain-of-function.pdf> from 
> the “Public Health Emergency” office of HHS that it references, orders 
> a pause on “Gain of Function” research into SARS-like coronaviruses.  
> What is “Gain of Function” research, precisely?  The document defines 
> it as “research that improves the ability of a pathogen to cause 
> disease … [by] “confer[ing] attributes to … SARS [coronaviruses] such 
> that the resulting virus has enhanced pathogenicity and/or 
> transmissibility (via the respiratory route) in mammals. … [that] may 
> entail biosafety and biosecurity risks.”
>
> The original scientific rationale for “enhancing” the ability of 
> certain coronaviruses to infect and kill human beings was to get one 
> step ahead of the net pandemic.  “We will create superbugs in the 
> lab,” the scientists said to themselves, “and we will learn how to 
> defeat them by developing drug therapies and vaccines.  Then when the 
> next superbug emerges from nature, we will be ready.”
>
> But what happens if you create a new superbug in the lab and, before 
> you have devised a defense against it, it escapes from the lab.  What 
> then?
>
> The consequences of unleashing such an “enhanced” coronavirus on the 
> world—a pathogen for which human beings had no natural defenses, and 
> for which human science had no treatments or vaccines—would be 
> incalculable.
>
> The U.S. pause on such research was not lifted 
> <https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/nih-lifts-funding-pause-gain-function-research> 
> until December 29, 2017, over three years later, when NIH put in place 
> what it called “robust oversight” that considers the “scientific 
> merits and potential benefits,” as well as the “potential to create 
> ... or use an enhanced potential pandemic pathogen.”
>
> In other words, the brakes were put on the dangerous 
> “gain-of-function” research being done in the U.S. for fear that it 
> would “create” a pathogen that could, if it leaked from the lab, cause 
> a pandemic.  We decided that the risks associated with such research 
> were generally not worth the benefits.
>
> Not so in China, however.  There, in Dr. Shi’s laboratory, the 
> creation of dangerous “pathogens of pandemic potential” apparently 
> went forward without pause or effective oversight.  Communist China is 
> not known for its concern for human life.
>
> Since we are now dealing with exactly the kind of deadly and 
> infectious SARS-like coronaviruses that scientists have been creating 
> in the lab for at least the past ten years, it is reasonable to ask if 
> the China Coronavirus is a naturally occurring virus.  Or is it one of 
> batwoman’s concoctions?
>
> Virtually everyone now agrees that the China Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, 
> leaked from Dr. Shi’s lab.  But I would suggest that the virus itself 
> is the product of Gain of Function research in which its potency was 
> artificially “enhanced” to make it more infectious and more lethal 
> using recombinant techniques first developed in the U.S., perhaps at 
> Prof. Baric’s lab.  The leak was an accident.  The “enhancement” was 
> deliberate.
>
> On March 30th of this year, an unusual, unsigned “Editor’s Note” was 
> added to Shi and Baric’s original article 
> <https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985#change-history> in Nature 
> Medicine.  The oddly worded note read: “We are aware that this article 
> is being used as the basis for unverified theories that the novel 
> coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that 
> this is true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely 
> source of the coronavirus.”
>
> Actually, the “most likely source” of the coronavirus is not just one 
> animal but two, whose distinct but related species of coronaviruses 
> were isolated from their hosts and then pieced together in the lab 
> using recombinant technology to create a new and much more infectious 
> variety.
>
> * * *
>
> In Part II I will review the evidence that the novel coronavirus is 
> the result of what Chinese researchers themselves have called an 
> “unusual insertion” in a Horseshoe Bat coronavirus that may have come 
> from a Pangolin coronavirus.
>
> /Steven W. Mosher @StevenWMosher is the President of the Population 
> Research Institute and the author of Bully of Asia: Why China’s 
> “Dream” is the New Threat to World Order.
>
> *RELATED: Listen to minutes 10-15 ofinterview with Senator Ted Cruz 
> <https://podbay.fm/podcast/1495601614/e/1587163440>*/
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> 
> 	Mentes a vírusoktól. www.avg.com 
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> 
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grem mailing list
> Grem at turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu
> http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/mailman/listinfo/grem


-- 
Ezt az e-mailt az Avast víruskereső szoftver átvizsgálta.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--------- következő rész ---------
Egy csatolt HTML állomány át lett konvertálva...
URL: <http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/pipermail/grem/attachments/20200426/85e7ff89/attachment.html>