<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>A jó öreg Luc ,már rájött erre .<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">2020.04.26. 19:47 keltezéssel, Emoke
Greschik írta:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CALP0BwPQqKjjjKnKaj9Kc_=GbE1uW_4rFKL5=1t2dcooJSXyFQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<h1 class="gmail-art-title">How COVID-19 may have been
deliberately engineered in a China biolab</h1>
<div class="gmail-art-subtitle"><font size="4"><b>The Wuhan
Virus may have been deliberately engineered in the
laboratory by joining parts of different viruses together
using what is called recombinant technology. </b></font></div>
<div class="gmail-date-share">
<div class="gmail-single-art-date"> <span
class="gmail-art-date">Wed Apr 22, 2020 - 4:04 pm EST</span></div>
<div class="gmail-single-art-date"><span
class="gmail-art-date"><a
href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/how-covid-19-may-have-been-deliberately-engineered-in-a-china-biolab"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/how-covid-19-may-have-been-deliberately-engineered-in-a-china-biolab</a></span></div>
</div>
<div class="gmail-single-article-ctr">
<div class="gmail-single-article-author-lg gmail-col-sm-2"> </div>
<div class="gmail-col-sm-10">
<div class="gmail-article-text-wrapper
gmail-single-article-body">
<div>
<p class="gmail-callout"
style="background-color:rgb(196,1,35);color:white"><em><strong>PETITION:
Thank President Trump for halting U.S. funding to
pro-abortion World Health Organization <a
href="https://lifepetitions.com/petition/urge-president-trump-to-defund-the-world-health-organization-over-alleged-coronavirus-cover-up"
style="color:white;text-decoration:underline"
moz-do-not-send="true">Sign the petition here.</a></strong></em></p>
</div>
<p dir="ltr"><span>April 22, 2020 (</span><a
href="http://lifesitenews.com/" moz-do-not-send="true">LifeSiteNews</a>)
– <span>Let’s start with the bats, the species known as
Intermediate Horseshoe Bat, to be exact. The Chinese
Communist authorities claim that the China Virus,
called SARS-CoV-2, is a naturally occurring
coronavirus that is carried by the Horseshoe Bat. They
also claim that the virus “jumped” from its normal
host to humans at the Wuhan “wet” market.</span></p>
<p><span>Both of these claims are demonstrably false.</span></p>
<p><span>Let’s start with the Wuhan “wet” market. As I </span><a
href="https://twitter.com/StevenWMosher/status/1249376965435555843"
moz-do-not-send="true">told</a> Jesse Watters on his
FOX news show, “Watters World,” last week, if the “wet”
market was actually “ground zero” for the outbreak, the
authorities would have burned it to the ground. Instead,
they have now reopened it.</p>
<p><span>It is an open secret in Wuhan that, as a team of
researchers from Wuhan </span><a
href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7079563/"
moz-do-not-send="true">noted</a> in late February,
that there were no bats in the market and that direct
transmission from bats to humans in the market was
“unlikely.” </p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Two other researchers had </span><a
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20200214144447/https:/www.researchgate.net/publication/339070128_The_possible_origins_of_2019-nCoV_coronavirus"
moz-do-not-send="true">reported</a> the same thing a
week earlier, namely, “[T]he bat was never a food source
in the city and no bat was traded in the market.” But
these researchers, both surnamed Xiao, went even
further. They pointed out that there were bats in
Wuhan--thousands of them—but they were being kept in two
biolabs not far from the “wet” market where they were
used for research purposes.</p>
<div class="gmail-ctr-text">
<div class="gmail-subscribe-form-ctr
gmail-subscribe-form-wrap">
<form class="gmail-lsn-newsletter
gmail-subscribe-form-revised gmail-run-validator"
method="post" action="/">
<div class="gmail-hiddenFields">
</div>
<div class="gmail-subscribe-first-line"> <span
class="gmail-subscribe-form-header">SUBSCRIBE</span>
<span class="gmail-subscribe-form-subheader">to
LifeSite's daily headlines</span> </div>
<div class="gmail-form-group email">
<div class="gmail-input-group
gmail-subscribe-input-group"> <input
type="email" class="gmail-input-lg
gmail-subscribe-email gmail-placeholder"
name="email" id="gmail-user-email"> <span
class="gmail-input-group-btn"> </span></div>
</div>
</form>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail-ctr-text">
<div class="gmail-subscribe-form-ctr
gmail-subscribe-form-wrap">
<form class="gmail-lsn-newsletter
gmail-subscribe-form-revised gmail-run-validator"
method="post" action="/">
<div class="gmail-form-group edition">
<div class="gmail-subscribe-form-group
gmail-subscribe-radio"> <label for="us-208295">U.S.</label>
<label for="canada-208295">Canada</label> <label
for="world-208295">World</label> <label
for="catholic-208295">Catholic</label> </div>
</div>
</form>
</div>
</div>
<p><span>They identified the two labs as the Wuhan Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Wuhan Institute
of Virology (WIV). The Wuhan CDC is the national center for
China’s bat coronavirus research. Wuhan Institute of
Virology uses recombinant technology to create and study new
coronaviruses. The conclusion of the two Doctors Xiao was
that “somebody was entangled with the evolution of
[SARS-CoV-2] … the killer coronavirus probably escaped from
a laboratory in Wuhan.” </span></p>
<p><span>Their word choice is a little awkward because the
researchers were writing in what is for them foreign
language. But what they clearly mean is that the China
Coronavirus now plaguing the planet is not the result of a
natural recombination of two different viruses in nature
through an intermediate host, as many claim. </span>Rather
it was deliberately engineered in the laboratory by joining
parts of different viruses together using what is called
recombinant technology. </p>
<p><span>More on the science of how this was done later. Right
now all you need to know is that, within a few hours of its
publication, their </span><a
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20200214144447/https:/www.researchgate.net/publication/339070128_The_possible_origins_of_2019-nCoV_coronavirus"
moz-do-not-send="true">paper</a> on “The possible origins of
[SARS-CoV-2] coronavirus” was withdrawn. This same fate has
since befallen several papers by Chinese authors who have
attempted, at great risk to themselves, to reveal the truth
about the origin of the outbreak to the world. </p>
<p><span>Now back to the bats.</span></p>
<p><span>China’s chief bat hunter is an employee of the Wuhan
CDC named Tian Junhua. Mr. Tian’s full-time job since 2012
has been collecting bat viruses for research purposes. Over
this time he collected thousands of live bats, as well as
countless samples of bat urine and feces, from caves over
six hundred miles distant from Wuhan. The tiny mammals
obviously didn’t get to the city under their own power, but
were trapped and transported to the two biolabs by the
industrious Mr. Tian. As the two Drs. Xiao wryly noted,
“The probability was very low for the bats to fly to the
market.”</span></p>
<p><span>As a result of the efforts of Mr. Tian and others,
China </span><a
href="https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/mar/30/china-researchers-isolated-bat-coronaviruses-near-/"
moz-do-not-send="true">now boasts</a> that it has “taken the
lead” in global virus research. It claims to have discovered
over 2,000 new viruses since the SARS Coronavirus epidemic of
2003. To give you a sense of the scale of China’s effort, the
total number of viruses discovered over the last two hundred
years is, at 2,284, only slightly more. China’s frenzied
collection efforts have nearly doubled the total number of
known viruses, and includes hundreds of new and possibly
dangerous coronaviruses. </p>
<p><span>That’s a lot of potentially harmful pathogens to keep
track of. But it is also a huge cache of coronaviruses to
harvest parts and pieces from if you are looking to make an
already deadly coronavirus even deadlier.</span></p>
<p><span>And that seems to be exactly what a group of
researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, led by a
woman named Shi Zhengli, may have been intent upon doing
right up until the end of 2019. </span></p>
<p><span>We all know what happened then.</span></p>
<h4><span>The Technology</span></h4>
<p><span>Shi Zhengli received her master’s degree from the Wuhan
Institute of Virology in 1990. After earning her Ph.D. in
France, she returned to WIV to direct the Institute’s
research project into bat coronaviruses. If Mr. Tian is
China’s batman, Dr. Shi is China’s batwoman.</span></p>
<p><span>Some of the articles </span><a
href="https://www.lifesitenews.com/blogs/disappeared-chinese-research-paper-traced-covid-19-to-china-biolab-in-wuhan"
moz-do-not-send="true">published by</a> Dr. Shi and her team
of virologists <a
href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12711"
moz-do-not-send="true">describe</a> naturally occurring
SARS-like coronaviruses that, like the SARS virus itself,
could infect human beings directly. </p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>But Dr. Shi’s group was not content to merely
study existing coronaviruses. They were also genetically
engineering new ones. </span>In a 2008 article in
the Journal of Virology, she and her team <a
href="https://jvi.asm.org/content/82/4/1899"
moz-do-not-send="true">described how</a> they were
genetically engineering SARS-like viruses from horseshoe bats
to enable them to use angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)
to gain entry into human cells.</p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>In other words, more than 10 years ago, Shi’s
team was already creating entirely new and deadly
coronaviruses. They did so by inserting that part of the
dangerous SARS virus that allows it to infect people into a
second bat coronavirus, which was then able to attack human
cells just like the original SARS virus does. </span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>But simply recreating a new SARS virus was
only a first step. Shi and her team wanted to move beyond
that to create completely new, and potentially even more
deadly coronaviruses. For that she needed a new and more
advanced recombinant technique. She may have found one in
research being done at the University of North Carolina by
Prof. Ralph S. Baric.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Prof. Baric had developed a technique for
quickly and easily producing what </span><a
href="https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-4939-6964-7_5"
moz-do-not-send="true">he called</a> “infectious clones.”
This involves taking coronaviruses from horseshoe bats and
genetically engineering them to more easily infect human
cells. </p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Why would he--or anyone else for that
matter--do such a thing?</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Baric </span><a
href="https://link.springer.com/protocol/10.1007/978-1-4939-6964-7_5"
moz-do-not-send="true">explains</a>: “In 2013 preemergent
SARS-like Coronaviruses <a
href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature12711"
moz-do-not-send="true">were identified</a> in horseshoe bats
and found to be poised for entry into the human population. …
preemergent coronaviruses (CoVs) pose a global threat that
requires immediate intervention. Rapid intervention
necessitates the capacity to generate, grow, and genetically
manipulate infectious CoVs in order to rapidly evaluate
pathogenic mechanisms, host and tissue permissibility, and
candidate antiviral therapeutic efficacy.” (italics added)</p>
<p><span>Now all of this—</span>preemergent coronaviruses …
poised for entry … global threat … requires immediate
intervention—all sounds very ominous. But what people need to
understand is that the good professor is talking about
coronaviruses that have not actually infected a single,
living, breathing human being. Rather, he is talking about
coronaviruses that might, possibly, at some point in the
future, make the leap from bats to humans. Or they might not.
Ever.</p>
<p><span>This means that the phrase “preemergent coronavirus” is
at best misleading, at worst a fiction. It is a fiction
because neither Prof. Baric, nor Dr. Shi Zhengli, nor anyone
else, can possibly know whether any one of these naturally
occurring viruses will ever infect a single human being.</span></p>
<p><span>In any event, Prof. Baric is very pleased to </span><a
href="https://www.pnas.org/content/100/22/12995"
moz-do-not-send="true">inform us</a>, <a
href="https://www.pnas.org/content/100/22/12995"
moz-do-not-send="true">citing</a> his own research, that
“much of the [coronavirus] research over the last 15 years has
been possible because of the capacity to generate infectious
clones using highly efficient reverse genetics platforms,
coupled with robust small animal models of human disease.”</p>
<p><span>In other words, he and his team used the technique they
created to easily construct unnatural coronaviruses and see
if they will </span><a
href="https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.0030005"
moz-do-not-send="true">infect and kill mice</a>. Dr. Shi
Zhengli collaborated with Baric in carrying out some of this
research, as highlighted in a 2015 <a
href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985"
moz-do-not-send="true">article</a> in Nature Medicine in
which they discussed bat coronaviruses that were potentially
capable of infecting human beings. </p>
<p><span>Now, a sane person might think that the idea of
creating dangerous new pathogens in the lab for which
humanity had no acquired immunity, no vaccines, and no drug
therapies might not be a good idea. The U.S. National
Institutes of Health, under the direction of Dr. Anthony
Fauci, however, initially funded Prof. Baric’s research. </span></p>
<p><span>But then Dr. Fauci had second thoughts. In late 2014
he</span> sent a letter to the University of North Carolina,
notifying the university that Prof. Baric’s research project
may violate a new moratorium on risky virology studies
involving influenza, MERS and SARS viruses. </p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The letter and </span><a
href="https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/Documents/gain-of-function.pdf"
moz-do-not-send="true">the document</a> from the “Public
Health Emergency” office of HHS that it references, orders a
pause on “Gain of Function” research into SARS-like
coronaviruses. What is “Gain of Function” research,
precisely? The document defines it as “research that improves
the ability of a pathogen to cause disease … [by] “confer[ing]
attributes to … SARS [coronaviruses] such that the resulting
virus has enhanced pathogenicity and/or transmissibility (via
the respiratory route) in mammals. … [that] may entail
biosafety and biosecurity risks.”</p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The original scientific rationale for
“enhancing” the ability of certain coronaviruses to infect
and kill human beings was to get one step ahead of the net
pandemic. “We will create superbugs in the lab,” the
scientists said to themselves, “and we will learn how to
defeat them by developing drug therapies and vaccines. Then
when the next superbug emerges from nature, we will be
ready.”</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>But what happens if you create a new superbug
in the lab and, before you have devised a defense against
it, it escapes from the lab. What then?</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The consequences of unleashing such an
“enhanced” coronavirus on the world—a pathogen for which
human beings had no natural defenses, and for which human
science had no treatments or vaccines—would be incalculable.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>The U.S. pause on such research was </span><a
href="https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/who-we-are/nih-director/statements/nih-lifts-funding-pause-gain-function-research"
moz-do-not-send="true">not lifted</a> until December 29,
2017, over three years later, when NIH put in place what it
called “robust oversight” that considers the “scientific
merits and potential benefits,” as well as the “potential to
create ... or use an enhanced potential pandemic pathogen.”</p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>In other words, the brakes were put on the
dangerous “gain-of-function” research being done in the U.S.
for fear that it would “create” a pathogen that could, if it
leaked from the lab, cause a pandemic. We decided that the
risks associated with such research were generally not worth
the benefits.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Not so in China, however. There, in Dr.
Shi’s laboratory, the creation of dangerous “pathogens of
pandemic potential” apparently went forward without pause or
effective oversight. Communist China is not known for its
concern for human life. </span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Since we are now dealing with exactly the
kind of deadly and infectious SARS-like coronaviruses that
scientists have been creating in the lab for at least the
past ten years, it is reasonable to ask if the China
Coronavirus is a naturally occurring virus. Or is it one of
batwoman’s concoctions? </span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>Virtually everyone now agrees that the China
Coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, leaked from Dr. Shi’s lab. But I
would suggest that the virus itself is the product of Gain
of Function research in which its potency was artificially
“enhanced” to make it more infectious and more lethal using
recombinant techniques first developed in the U.S., perhaps
at Prof. Baric’s lab. The leak was an accident. The
“enhancement” was deliberate.</span></p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>On March 30</span>th of this year, an
unusual, unsigned “Editor’s Note” was added to Shi and Baric’s
<a
href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985#change-history"
moz-do-not-send="true">original article</a> in Nature
Medicine. The oddly worded note read: “We are aware that this
article is being used as the basis for unverified theories
that the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered.
There is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe
that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus.”</p>
<p><span>Actually, the “most likely source” of the coronavirus
is not just one animal but two, whose distinct but related
species of coronaviruses were isolated from their hosts and
then pieced together in the lab using recombinant technology
to create a new and much more infectious variety.</span></p>
<p><span>*</span> * *</p>
<p dir="ltr"><span>In Part II I will review the evidence that
the novel coronavirus is the result of what Chinese
researchers themselves have called an “unusual insertion” in
a Horseshoe Bat coronavirus that may have come from a
Pangolin coronavirus.</span></p>
<p><em><span>Steven W. Mosher @StevenWMosher is the President of
the Population Research Institute and the author of </span>Bully
of Asia: Why China’s “Dream” is the New Threat to World
Order.<br>
<br>
<strong>RELATED: Listen to minutes 10-15 of<a
href="https://podbay.fm/podcast/1495601614/e/1587163440"
moz-do-not-send="true"> interview with Senator Ted Cruz</a></strong></em></p>
</div>
<div id="DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2"><br>
<table style="border-top:1px solid #d3d4de">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width:55px;padding-top:18px"><a
href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail"
target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"><img
src="https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png"
alt="" style="width: 46px; height: 29px;"
moz-do-not-send="true" width="46" height="29"></a></td>
<td
style="width:470px;padding-top:17px;color:#41424e;font-size:13px;font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;line-height:18px">Mentes
a vírusoktól. <a
href="http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail"
target="_blank" style="color:#4453ea"
moz-do-not-send="true">www.avg.com</a> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
Grem mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Grem@turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu">Grem@turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/mailman/listinfo/grem">http://turul.kgk.uni-obuda.hu/mailman/listinfo/grem</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>